Evaluation of scientific journals in human and social sciences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2283-9364/8954Keywords:
Research evaluation, ANVUR, Scientific Journals, Peer-review, Ethics in research evaluationAbstract
The paper discusses the criteria adopted from 2016 by the ANVUR – the Italian Agency for the evaluation of the Universities and of the scientific research – in order to classify the scientific journals in the SSH fields, in which bibliometric indicators are not used. In particular, the paper analyzes the decision to create a class of excellence for journals and to assess the quality of articles, and of journals, using the VQR scores. Besides, the paper addresses problems connected to the peer-review, the methodology proposed by ANVUR in SSH evaluation, and highlights the lack of international guidelines and ethical criteria in scientific research evaluation.
References
Baccini 2010 = Alberto Baccini, Valutare la ricerca scientifica. Uso e abuso degli indicatori bibliometrici, Bologna, Il Mulino, 2010.
Biagetti 2017 = Maria Teresa Biagetti, Valutare la ricerca nelle scienze umane e sociali. Potenzialità e limiti della Library catalog analysis. Con scritti di Antonella Iacono e Antonella Trombone, Milano, Bibliografica, 2017.
Furner 2014 = Jonathan Furner, The Ethics of Evaluative Bibliometrics, in Beyond Bibliometrics: harnessing multidimensional indicators of scholarly impact, edited by Blaise Cronin and Cassidy R. Sugimoto, Cambridge (Mass.)-London, The MIT Press, 2014, p. 85-107.
Giménez-Toledo [et al.] 2016 = Elea Giménez-Toledo - Jorge Mañana-Rodríguez - Tim C. E. Engels - Peter Ingwersen - Janne Pölönen - Gunnar Sivertsen - Frederik T. Verleysen - Alesia A. Zuccala, Taking scholarly books into account: current developments in five European countries, «Scientometrics», February 2016, p. 685-699.
Hicks 2004 = Diana M. Hicks, The four literatures of Social Science, in Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems, edited by Henk F. Moed, Wolfgang Glänzel and Ulrich Schmoch, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004, p. 473-496, <http://works.bepress.com/diana_hicks/16/>.
Hicks - Wouters 2015 = Diana M. Hicks - Paul Wouters, The Leiden
Manifesto for research metrics. Use these ten principles to guide research evaluation, «Nature», 520 (2015), 7548, p. 429-431 (23 April 2015), <http://www.nature.com/news/bibliometrics-the-leiden-manifesto-forresearch-metrics-1.17351>.
Lamont 2009 = Michèle Lamont, How professors think. Inside the curious world of academic judgement, Cambridge-London, Harvard University Press, 2009.
Larivière [et al.] 2006 = Vincent Larivière - Éric Archambault - Yves Gingras - Étienne Vignola-Gagné, The place of serials in referencing practices: comparing Natural sciences and Engineering with Social sciences and Humanities, «Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology», 57 (2006), 8, p. 997-1004.
Moed 2005 = Henk F. Moed, Citation analysis in research evaluation, Dordrecht, Springer, 2005.
Moed 2007 = Henk F. Moed, The future of research evaluation rests with an intelligent combination of advanced metrics and transparent peer review, «Science and Public Policy», 34 (2007), 8, p. 575-583.
Ochsner - Hug - Galleron 2017 = Michael Ochsner - Sven Hug - Ioana Galleron, The future of research assessment in the humanities: bottom-up assessment procedures, «Palgrave communications», 3, 2017.
Torres-Salinas [et al.] 2014 = Daniel Torres-Salinas - Nicolás Robinson-García - Álvaro Cabezas-Clavijo - Evaristo Jiménez-Contreras, Analyzing the citation characteristics of books: edited books, book series and publisher types in the Book Citation Index, «Scientometrics», 98 (2014), 3, p. 2113-2127.
Wouters 2014 = Paul Wouters, The citation: from culture to infrastructure, in Beyond Bibliometrics: harnessing multidimensional indicators of scholarly impact, edited by Blaise Cronin and Cassidy R. Sugimoto, Cambridge (Mass.) - London, The MIT Press, 2014, p. 47-66.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Maria Teresa Biagetti
The copyrights of all the texts on this journal belong to the respective authors without restrictions.
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (full legal code).
See also our Open Access Policy.
Metadata
All the metadata of the published material is released in the public domain and may be used by anyone free of charge. This includes references.
Metadata — including references — may be re-used in any medium without prior permission for both not-for-profit and for-profit purposes. We kindly ask users to provide a link to the original metadata record.
